Intel core i5 12400f
Last up we have Cyberpunk 2077 and this game is mostly GPU bound, even with the slightly dialed down quality settings that we’re using here. The 12400 was able to nudge a few frames ahead of the 5600X while trailing the 12600K by just 4%.
Desktop Computers
Workstations equipped for AI development with Intel HX, Xeon or AMD Threadripper Pro CPUs and configurable with NVIDIA RTX 5000 GPUs or higher.
AI Workstations
All-in-One Screen Size
Shipping & Delivery
- Free 2-Day Delivery (56)
- Ships Within 5 Days (118)
- Ships Within 10 Days (118)
Processor
- All Intel Processors (116)
- Intel Core i9 K Series (6)
- Intel Core 9 + Intel Core i9 (17)
- Intel Core i7 K Series (4)
- Intel Core 7 + Intel Core i7 (57)
- Intel Core 5 + Intel Core i5 (33)
- Intel Core 3 + Intel Core i3 (6)
- Intel Xeon (3)
- All AMD Processors (7)
- AMD Ryzen 5 (4)
- AMD Ryzen 3 (2)
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO (1)
Processor Platform & Generation
- Intel vPro (5)
- 14th Gen Intel Core (95)
- 13th Gen Intel Core (2)
- AMD Ryzen 7000 Series (6)
Operating System
- Windows 11 Home (47)
- Windows 11 Pro (76)
Price
- $500 or less (1)
- $501–$1,000 (41)
- $1,001–$1,500 (40)
- $1,501–$2,000 (21)
- $2,001 or more (20)
Please enter values between $500 and $5,419.
Memory (RAM)
Storage Size
Storage Type
Graphics
- All NVIDIA Graphics (58)
- All AMD Graphics (8)
- All Intel Graphics (50)
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 (3)
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER (3)
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (2)
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (3)
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 (6)
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (7)
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (10)
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 (2)
- AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX (1)
- NVIDIA T400 (5)
PC Features
- CD/DVD Burner (13)
- No Optical Drive (53)
- Wi-Fi 6 (102)
Touch Screen
- Touch Screen (10)
- Non-touch Screen (16)
Customer Rating
- 4 stars & up (122)
- 3 stars & up (122)
- 2 stars & up (122)
- 1 star & up (122)
Show 123 Results
Available models
- XPS Desktop
- OptiPlex Micro Form Factor
- OptiPlex Small Form Factor
- OptiPlex Tower
- OptiPlex Micro Form Factor Plus
- OptiPlex All-in-One (35-Watt CPU)
- OptiPlex Small Form Factor Plus
- OptiPlex All-in-One (65-Watt CPU)
- OptiPlex Tower Plus
- OptiPlex All-in-One Plus
- OptiPlex 7000 XE Micro Form Factor and Logitech Tap for Teams
- Inspiron Small Desktop
- Inspiron 24 All-in-One
- Inspiron Desktop
- Inspiron 24 All-in-One
- Inspiron 27 All-in-One
- Alienware Aurora R16
- Precision 3280 Compact
- Precision 3680 Tower Workstation
- Precision 3460 Small Form Factor Workstation
- Precision 5860 Tower Workstation
- Precision 7875 Tower Workstation
- Precision 7960 Tower Workstation
- Precision 7960 Rack Workstation
1 to 12 of 123 Results 123
Sort by:
<"identifier":"s012do7020mffus_vp","productData":<"dellPrice":"739","marketPrice":"1029","shopUrl":"//www.dell.com/en-us/shop/desktop-computers/optiplex-micro-form-factor/spd/optiplex-7020-micro/s012do7020mffus_vp">,»metrics»:>"identifier":"s012do7020mffus_vp","productData":
Compare Select 2 or more products to compare them side-by-side Compare
Benchmarks
Starting with the Cinebench R23 multi-core results, we find that the 12400 is good for just over 12,000 points, and when following the 65-watt spec, it was just 3% slower. That being the case, it’s incredible to see the base-spec 12400 beating the 11600K by an 8% margin and the 10600K by a massive 32%.
Perhaps most impressive of all is the 9% margin it defeated the 5600X by, which doesn’t bode particularly well for AMD. Finally when compared to the 12600K, the 12400 was 30% slower and this is partly due to the 10% reduction in frequency along with the removal of the 4 E-cores and a 10% reduction in L3 cache capacity.
The single core performance was also very mighty, and this of course explains how the 12400 beat the 5600X. Here we’re looking at a 12% improvement in performance.
Moving on to 7-Zip, the 12400 is less impressive though it manages to slightly edge out the 11600K. That in itself is a good result. When compared to the 5600X it was 12% slower and 13% slower than the 12600K, though given the difference in price, that remains a good result for the locked Core i5 part.
Unfortunately, it doesn’t fare nearly as well for the decompression test as the 12400 was only able to edge out the 10600K making it slower than the 11600K by a 12% margin and almost 30% slower than the 5600X.
The Corona benchmark sees the 12400 delivering exceptional levels of performance, beating the 11600K and 5600X. Taking 117 seconds to complete the workload meant it was 9% faster than the 5600X, despite being 26% slower than the 12600K.
The Core i5-12400 was good for a score of 667 pts when running without power limits in the Adobe Premiere Pro benchmark and that meant it was able to match the 8-core/16-thread 10700K, while beating the 5600X by 8%.
Then when power limited to the 65w spec, it matched the 5600X making it 8% slower than the unleashed configuration.
Adobe Photoshop isn’t a core-heavy application, so both i5-12400 configurations delivered virtually the same result. That means no matter which way you slice it, the locked Core i5 is as powerful as the Ryzen 5 5600X. The 12600K, on the other hand, is clocked 11% higher and consequently was 11% faster in this test.
In After Effects, the 12400 was only 2% faster with the power limits removed. That made it 7% faster than the 5600X and 6% faster than the previous generation 11600K.
Once again we’re including Factorio in the application benchmarks not to measure fps, but rather updates per second. This automated benchmark calculates the time it takes to run 1,000 updates. This is a single-thread test which apparently relies heavily on cache performance.
Because this game only uses a single core heavily, the power configuration doesn’t matter, allowing the 12400 to produce a score of 202 pts even when adhering to the 65-watt spec. That’s the same score you’ll receive from a Zen 3 processor and only 2.5% less than the 12600K.
When it comes to code compilation performance, the 12400 is a beast, completing our test in 6070 seconds, making it 24% faster than the 5600X and 13% faster than the 11600K. In fact, it was only 8% slower than the 5800X, though it was 21% slower than the 12600K.
The last application we’re going to look at is Blender, where the 12400 was just able to edge out the 5600X while matching the 11600K. That’s as good as 6-core/12-thread performance gets in this application.
Intel Core i5-12400F
Benchmarks for the Intel Core i5-12400F can be found below. Release dates, price and performance comparisons are also listed when available. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.
- The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
- The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
- The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.
Is the Intel Core i5-12400F Good for Gaming?
This is relatively new CPU that contains 6 Cores and 12 Threads. The Intel Core i5-12400F also has reasonable threaded performance that will serve well in games. Paired with a good videocard, is this CPU Good for Gaming? Yes, this would be a suitable CPU for gaming. [More . ]
MORE DETAILS
User Builds
18,684
48,886
Systems with these CPUs
Top Builds that include these CPUs
- HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa0xxx (2,725)
- MSI MS-16R8 (894)
- Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC_FX517ZC (737)
- Lenovo 82S9 (723)
- Acer Nitro AN515-58 (603)
- Lenovo 82XV (440)
- MSI MS-15K1 (368)
- Gigabyte B660M DS3H DDR4 (2,475)
- Asus PRIME B660-PLUS D4 (1,749)
- Gigabyte GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4 (1,209)
- MSI PRO B660M-A WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D43) (1,152)
- Acer Nitro N50-640 (1,114)
- Asus PRIME B660M-A D4 (1,054)
- Asus PRIME H610M-K D4 (1,050)
Core i5-12400F
Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.
- — Download and run UserBenchmark
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC
- — See speed test results from other users
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
Источники:
https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/desktop-computers/sr/desktops/optiplex-desktops&rut=79491741d9ff02a74aaccc1a43cb557e64a8aa728fa1e02ea40c0508559e652d
https://www.techspot.com/review/2392-intel-core-i5-12400/&rut=b9bcda04c750b8fb2d79139a0abf928e9e2272b92d3532af10857eee2a165d21
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i5-12400F&rut=c406b012a44954bf7cb8f0d73cacecf713af68cf8708ea982c979e522c8d5b25
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-12450H-vs-Intel-Core-i5-12400F/m1814904vs4121&rut=8d8ecba7fd4ad2c5c1ccebc7b06bd78b93620ff7456e9b9bfcdd305f8f358107
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Intel-Core-i5-12400F/Rating/4121&rut=ea4db57f86f813a44469ed6cf3552c6f8d4512e227297823a5845f3a122d032d